[DARCO ORDER NO. CASE-10-02637.  November 23, 2010.]
A-9999-11-RT-064-08

IN RE: PETITION FOR EXEMPTION FROM CARP COVERAGE AND APPLICATION FOR RETENTION

SPOUSES LAUREANO SUAREZ AND CONCHITA SUAREZ, petitioners-appellants, vs. PARO OF DAVAO CITY, ET AL., respondents-appellees.

RESOLUTION

Before this Office is a Motion for Reconsideration dated 06 March 2010, filed by petitioners-appellants, assailing the Order dated 09 February 2010, issued by this Office. The dispositive portion of the assailed Order reads:

"WHEREFORE, premises considered, the instant Appeal is DENIED for lack of merit. The Order dated 29 February 2010 issued by the Regional Director of DAR Regional Office XI is hereby AFFIRMED in toto.

SO ORDERED."

After a careful evaluation of the arguments raised in the instant Motion for Reconsideration and the records of the case, this Office finds no cogent reason to reverse or modify the assailed Order. The arguments raised in the instant Motion are a mere rehash of the issues which had already been judiciously passed upon by this Office. There being no new matter raised which would warrant the reversal or modification of the assailed Order, this Office is hereby constrained to deny the instant Motion for Reconsideration.

WHEREFORE, premises considered, the instant Motion for Reconsideration dated 06 March 2010, filed by petitioners-appellants is hereby DENIED for lack of merit.

SO ORDERED.

Diliman, Quezon City, November 23, 2010.

(SGD.) VIRGILIO R. DE LOS REYES
Secretary